A recent virtual roundtable, with guest speaker Will Dent from the Office for Students, brought together audit committee chairs to explore the financial sustainability challenges facing higher education. The discussion focused on emerging sector trends, the realism of financial forecasts, and the growing need for structural adaptation in response to an increasingly constrained environment.
A central theme was the tension between institutional forecasts and external reality. Participants noted that while short-term financial forecasts are often achieved or slightly exceeded, longer-term projections tend to be significantly more optimistic. This optimism is frequently underpinned by anticipated growth in student numbers, particularly international students, which may not materialise in the current environment. Institutions should prepare for scenarios where growth falls short or reverses altogether.
This links closely to one of the most pressing risks discussed: over-reliance on international student recruitment. Recent data trends indicate a slowdown in growth and potential decline in international applications driven by economic pressures, policy changes and visa constraints. The implications extend beyond institutions with large international cohorts. A reduction in overseas students can trigger increased competition in the domestic market, as higher tariff institutions seek to replace lost income by recruiting more UK students. This has a cascading effect across the sector, intensifying pressure on lower tariff providers.
Participants raised concerns that many institutions are not sufficiently prepared for downside scenarios. While forecasting and stress testing are becoming more common, there is still limited evidence that institutions are fully equipped to respond to sustained reductions in student numbers or income. This highlights the need for more robust scenario planning, particularly focused on contraction rather than growth.
The discussion also explored the broader financial position of the sector. Declining surpluses and weakening liquidity were identified as ongoing trends, with many institutions operating on increasingly narrow margins. While cost-saving measures have provided some short-term relief, it was widely acknowledged that cost reduction alone is not a viable long-term solution. As one participant noted, “you cannot cut your way to financial viability” when doing so risks undermining the quality of the student experience and institutional offering.
Instead, attention turned to the structural challenges facing the sector. Several participants described the trajectory as an impending catastrophe reflecting a growing consensus that the current number and configuration of institutions may not be sustainable in the medium to long term. There was a clear sense that consolidation, collaboration and alternative operating models will need to play a greater role in the future.
However, significant barriers to change remain. Regulatory frameworks, legislative constraints and financial considerations can all make mergers or shared service arrangements complex and difficult to execute. In particular, factors such as VAT treatment of shared services and employment-related obligations were cited as practical obstacles that limit flexibility. While some progress is being made through individual mergers and collaborations, the absence of a coordinated sector-wide framework presents a challenge.
There was also recognition of a gap in system-level planning. Unlike private markets, where consolidation is often driven by investors and competitive pressures, higher education lacks an overarching mechanism to shape the structure of the sector. This creates uncertainty about how the system will evolve and what the “end state” might look like. Participants highlighted the need for greater clarity and coordination, particularly given the sector’s economic, regional and social importance.
In the absence of systemic intervention, institutions are exploring alternative approaches to income diversification and risk management. These include transnational education partnerships and expansion into new markets or delivery models. However, these strategies carry their own risks and are unlikely to provide immediate financial returns. In many cases, they require upfront investment and careful management, with benefits accruing over a longer timeframe.
From a governance perspective, the discussion emphasised the critical role of audit committees and boards in navigating this environment. Strong financial controls, high-quality management information and a clear understanding of key performance indicators were identified as essential foundations. In particular, there was a call for sharper focus on leading indicators of financial performance, such as recruitment trends, rather than relying solely on historic financial reporting.
More broadly, boards were encouraged to challenge underlying assumptions, particularly around growth and income generation, and to ensure that institutions are preparing for a range of potential scenarios. This includes having clear and actionable plans for responding to downturns, rather than relying on optimistic forecasts.
Ultimately, the discussion highlighted the scale and complexity of the challenges facing higher education. While there are mitigating actions available at an institutional level, many of the most significant barriers require coordinated sectoral and policy responses. In the meantime, it was considered that many institutions may need to operate with greater realism, agility and resilience, with governance playing a central role in ensuring sustainable outcomes.
We’d love to hear from you. To book an appointment or to find out more about our services:
